Discussion:
Solar maximum could hit us harder and sooner than we thought. How dangerous will the sun's chaotic peak be?
(too old to reply)
useapen
2023-11-20 08:58:27 UTC
Permalink
Update: On Oct. 25, NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center released an
"updated prediction" for Solar Cycle 25. The new forecast more closely
matches the timeframe laid out in this feature and agrees with the
predictions of experts who spoke to Live Science about the upcoming solar
maximum.

From a distance, the sun may seem calm and steady. But zoom in, and our
home star is actually in a perpetual state of flux, transforming over time
from a uniform sea of fire to a chaotic jumble of warped plasma and back
again in a recurring cycle.

Every 11 years or so, the sun's magnetic field gets tangled up like a ball
of tightly wound rubber bands until it eventually snaps and completely
flips — turning the north pole into the south pole and vice versa. In the
lead-up to this gargantuan reversal, the sun amps up its activity:
belching out fiery blobs of plasma, growing dark planet-size spots and
emitting streams of powerful radiation.

This period of increased activity, known as solar maximum, is also a
potentially perilous time for Earth, which gets bombarded by solar storms
that can disrupt communications, damage power infrastructure, harm some
living creatures (including astronauts) and send satellites plummeting
toward the planet.

And some scientists think the next solar maximum may be coming sooner —
and be much more powerful — than we thought.

Originally, scientists predicted that the current solar cycle would peak
in 2025. But a bumper crop of sunspots, solar storms and rare solar
phenomena suggest solar maximum could arrive by the end of this year at
the earliest — and several experts told Live Science we are poorly
prepared.

Related: 10 signs the sun is gearing up for its explosive peak — the solar
maximum

What causes the solar cycle?
Approximately every 11 years, the sun goes from a low point in solar
activity, known as solar minimum, to solar maximum and back again. It's
not clear exactly why the sun's cycles last this long, but astronomers
have noted the pattern ever since the first, aptly named Solar Cycle 1,
which occurred between 1755 and 1766. The current cycle, Solar Cycle 25,
officially began in December 2019, according to NASA.

So what causes our home star's fluctuation? "It all comes down to the
sun's magnetic field," Alex James, a solar physicist at University College
London in the U.K., told Live Science.

At solar minimum, the sun's magnetic field is strong and organized, with
two clear poles like a normal dipole magnet, James said. The magnetic
field acts as a "giant forcefield" that contains the sun's superheated
plasma, or ionized gas, close to the surface, suppressing solar activity,
he added.

But the magnetic field slowly gets tangled, with some regions becoming
more magnetized than others, James said. As a result, the sun's magnetic
field gradually weakens, and solar activity begins to ramp up: Plasma
rises from the star's surface and forms massive magnetized horseshoes,
known as coronal loops, that pepper the sun's lower atmosphere. These
fiery ribbons can then snap as the sun's magnetic field realigns,
releasing bright flashes of light and radiation, known as solar flares.
Sometimes, flares also bring enormous, magnetized clouds of fast-moving
particles, known as coronal mass ejections (CMEs).

A few years after the maximum, the sun's magnetic field "snaps" and then
completely flips. This ushers in the end of the cycle and the beginning of
a new solar minimum, James said.

Related: Could a solar storm ever destroy Earth?

To determine where we are in the solar cycle, researchers monitor sunspots
— darker, cooler, circular patches of our local star's surface where
coronal loops form.

"Sunspots appear when strong magnetic fields poke through the surface of
the sun," James said. "By looking at those sunspots we can get an idea of
how strong and complex the sun's magnetic field is at that moment."

Sunspots are almost completely absent at solar minimum and increase in
numbers until a peak at solar maximum, but there's a lot of variation from
cycle to cycle.

"Every cycle is different," James said.

Solar Cycle 25
In April 2019, the Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel, which is made up of
dozens of scientists from NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), released its forecast for Solar Cycle 25,
suggesting that the solar maximum would likely begin sometime in 2025 and
would be comparable in size to the maximum of Solar Cycle 24, which peaked
unusually late between mid-2014 and early 2016 and was quite weak compared
with past solar maximums.

But from the beginning, the forecast seemed off. For instance, the number
of observed sunspots has been much higher than predicted.

In December 2022, the sun reached an eight-year sunspot peak. And in
January 2023, scientists observed more than twice as many sunspots as NASA
had predicted (143 observed versus 63 estimated), with the numbers staying
nearly as high over the following months. In total, the number of observed
sunspots has exceeded the predicted number for 27 months in a row.

While the bounty of sunspots is a major red flag, they are not the only
evidence solar maximum could be here soon.

Another key indicator of solar activity is the number and intensity of
solar flares. In 2022, there were fivefold more C-class and M-class solar
flares than there were in 2021, and year on year, the number of the most
powerful, X-class solar flares is also increasing, according to
SpaceWeatherLive.com. The first half of 2023 logged more X-class flares
than in all of 2022, and at least one has directly hit Earth. (Solar flare
classes include A, B, C, M and X, with each class being at least 10 times
more powerful than the previous one.)

Related: 10 solar storms that blew us away in 2022

Solar flares can also bring geomagnetic storms — major disturbances of
Earth's magnetosphere caused by solar wind or CMEs. For instance, on March
24, a "stealth" CME hit Earth without warning and triggered the most
powerful geomagnetic storm in more than six years, which created vast
auroras, or northern lights, that were visible in more than 30 U.S.
states. An overall increase in the number of geomagnetic storms this year
has also caused the temperature in the thermosphere — the second-highest
layer of Earth's atmosphere - to reach a 20-year peak.

Rare solar phenomena also become increasingly common near solar maximum —
and several have happened in recent months. On March 9, a 60,000-mile-tall
(96,560 kilometers) plasma waterfall rose above and then fell back towards
the sun; on Feb. 2 an enormous polar vortex, or ring of fire, swirled
around the sun's north pole for more than 8 hours; and in March, a "solar
tornado" raged for three days and stood taller than 14 Earths stacked on
top of each other.

All this evidence suggests that the solar maximum is "going to peak
earlier and it's going to peak higher than expected," James told Live
Science. This opinion is shared by many other solar physicists, experts
told Live Science.

The exact start to solar maximum will likely only be obvious once it has
passed and solar activity decreases. However, one research group led by
Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist and deputy director of the National
Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, has predicted the solar
maximum could peak later this year.

Past cycles suggest the solar maximum may last for somewhere between one
and two years, though scientists don't know for sure.

Potential impacts on Earth
So, the solar maximum may be coming on stronger and sooner than we
anticipated. Why does that matter?

The answer primarily depends on whether solar storms barrel into Earth,
Tzu-Wei Fang, a researcher at NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center who
was not part of the Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel, told Live Science. To
hit Earth, solar storms must be pointing in the right direction at the
right time. Increases in solar activity make this more likely but don't
guarantee the planet will be slammed with more storms, she added.

But if a solar storm does hit, it can ionize Earth's upper atmosphere and
fuel radio and satellite blackouts. Big storms that block the planet's
connections to satellites can temporarily wipe out long-range radio and
GPS systems for up to half the planet, Fang said. On its own, that is
just a minor inconvenience, but if a lengthy blackout coincided with a
major disaster, such as an earthquake or tsunami, the results could be
catastrophic, she added.

Strong solar storms can also generate ground-based electrical currents
that can damage metallic infrastructure, including older power grids and
rail lines, Fang said.

Airplane passengers may also be walloped by higher levels of radiation
during solar storms, although it's not clear if the doses would be high
enough to have any health impacts, Fang said. However, such spikes in
radiation would be much more significant for astronauts onboard
spacecraft, such as the International Space Station or the upcoming
Artemis mission to the moon. As a result, "future missions should factor
solar cycles into consideration," she added.

Related: Could a powerful solar storm wipe out the internet?

Past research has also revealed that geomagnetic storms can disrupt the
migrations of gray whales and other animals that rely on the Earth's
magnetic field lines to navigate, such as sea turtles and some birds,
which can have disastrous consequences.

An ionized upper atmosphere also becomes denser, which can create
additional drag for Earth-orbiting satellites. This extra drag can push
satellites into each other or force them out of orbit. For instance, In
February 2022, 40 of SpaceX's Starlink satellites burned up in Earth's
atmosphere when they plummeted to Earth during a geomagnetic storm the day
after they were launched.

And the number of satellites has exponentially increased compared with
past solar cycles, Fang said. Most are operated by commercial companies
that rarely factor space weather into satellite design or launch
schedules, she added.

"Companies want to launch satellites as soon as they can to make sure they
don't delay rocket launches," Fang said. "Sometimes it's better for them
to launch a group and lose half than not launch at all." This all raises
the risks of major collisions or deorbiting satellites during the solar
maximum, she added.

The chances of a once-in-a-century superstorm, such as the Carrington
Event in 1859, also slightly increase during solar maximum, Fang said.
While a long shot, such a storm could cause trillions of dollars' worth of
damage and majorly impact everyday life, she added.

Humans can do little to shield ourselves from a direct solar storm hit,
but we can prepare for them by altering satellite trajectories, grounding
planes and identifying vulnerable infrastructure, Fang said. As a result,
more accurate solar weather forecasts are needed to help us prepare for
the worst, she added

Why were the forecasts wrong?
If so many clues point to solar maximum being stronger and earlier than
predicted, why didn't scientists see it coming? Part of the problem is the
way the prediction panels come up with their forecasts, Scott McIntosh
told Live Science.

NASA and NOAA's models have barely changed in the last 30 years, "but the
science has," McIntosh said. The models use data from past solar cycles
such as sunspot number and cycle length, but do not fully account for each
cycle's individual progression, he added.

Related: When will the sun explode?

"It's kind of like a big game of pin the tail on the donkey," McIntosh
said, where the "donkey" is the upcoming solar maximum and the prediction
panel has blindfolded themselves by not using all available methods at
their disposal.

McIntosh and colleagues have proposed an alternative way to predict the
strength of an upcoming solar maximum: so-called "solar terminators,"
which occur right at the end of each solar minimum after the sun's
magnetic field has already flipped.

During solar minimum, a localized magnetic field, which is left behind
from the sun's magnetic-field flip, surrounds the sun's equator. This
localized field prevents the sun's main magnetic field from growing
stronger and getting tangled up, meaning the localized field essentially
acts like a handbrake preventing solar activity from increasing.

But suddenly and without warning, this localized field disappears,
releasing the brake and enabling solar activity to ramp up. This drastic
change is what the team dubbed solar cycle termination events, or
terminators. (Because solar terminators occur at the exact moment solar
minimums end, they occur after each solar cycle has officially begun.)

Looking back over centuries of data, the team identified 14 individual
solar terminators that preceded the start of solar maximums. The
researchers noticed that the timing of these terminators correlates with
the strength of the subsequent solar peaks. (The early years of data are
sparse, so the team couldn't identify solar terminators in every cycle.)

For example, the terminator at the start of Solar Cycle 24 happened later
than expected, which allowed for less magnetic field growth during Solar
Cycle 24, resulting in a weaker solar maximum. But the terminator at the
start of Solar Cycle 25, which occurred on Dec. 13, 2021, was earlier than
expected, which the researchers took as a sign that the solar maximum
would be stronger than the previous one. Ever since the 2021 terminator,
solar activity has been ramping up faster than expected.

The way Solar Cycle 25 is progressing suggests that solar terminators
could be the best way of predicting future solar cycles, McIntosh said. In
July 2022, NASA acknowledged the work done by McIntosh and colleagues and
noted that solar activity seemed to be ramping up sooner than expected.

Still, NASA hasn't updated its 2025 forecast in light of McIntosh's data
and is probably not going to incorporate terminators into future
forecasts, McIntosh predicted. "I think they will just stick with their
models."

https://www.livescience.com/space/the-sun/solar-maximum-could-hit-us-
harder-and-sooner-than-we-thought-how-dangerous-will-the-suns-chaotic-
peak-
be#:~:text=Another%20key%20indicator%20of%20solar,%2C%20according%20to%20S
paceWeatherLive.com.
R Kym Horsell
2023-11-20 10:28:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by useapen
Update: On Oct. 25, NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center released an
"updated prediction" for Solar Cycle 25. The new forecast more closely
matches the timeframe laid out in this feature and agrees with the
predictions of experts who spoke to Live Science about the upcoming solar
maximum.
...

The upcoming solar maximum looks lower than previous ones. At least on the
plots. :)

It's an long-standing myth at sunpots somehow affect global temperatures.
But, again, the data says no in 3 different ways.

The plots of the numbers upto mid 2023 is here:
<kym.massbus.org/SUNSPOTS>.

On A.G-W we had a long running arument at one point where "someone"
claimed to have proved that if the surface of the sun changes its
temperature my a "mili Kelvin" it would affect the earth enough to
raise its avg temp 1C. But it turned out that guy could not work
his algebra and the correct solution to his equation showed 1 mili Kelvin
at the sun would affect the earth by the ration of Te/Ts where Te
is the abs temp (deg K) for the earth and Ts is the abs temp of the
surface of the sun -- i.e. 300/5000. You do the math. :)
--
[New Hillbilly Theory: No suspots cause cold;
so mo sunspots -> warm eben at exactly same time?:]
Post by useapen
"Extreme Weather" the bots are calling it, trying to pretend
that it's so hot that it's cold...
We're in a solar minimum. That's why it's cold.
[Large Sunspot Count in Arctic:]
Daily Mirror @DailyMirror 14 Nov 2019 06:56Z
Kids play in Arctic seas as 22C heatwave grips climate change
frontline #MirrorClimateCrisis
<https://t.co/iSKrTySBuy>mirror.co.uk/news/world-new...
pic.twitter.com/9sVOQZp8jM
Korntydicshun?
-- rkh, 14 Nov 2019 07:47Z
Loading...